By: Chas Newkey-Burden On:
The rumblings over the Goldstone report continue – even the Obama administration has criticised it. The report was commissioned by the UN Human Rights Council (which has adopted more resolutions condemning Israel than against all the other 191 member states combined) and its fundamental bias and flaws are transparent.
* There were known anti-Israel people on the panel, including one who had made her position clear long before the investigation even began.
* It elevated unverifiable testimony given by Hamas sympathisers to the status of ‘fact’.
* It accepted evidence from a man who wears Nazi t-shirts and has a track record of making later-disproved allegations against Israel.
* It ignored evidence in Israel’s favour and all evidence of Hamas crimes during Operation Cast Lead.
* It included a Jew on the panel as a fig-leaf to antisemites.
* Unsurprisingly, it produced a biased report with distortions and mistakes from the title page onwards.
So let’s use the Goldstone report as a test of the sincerity of Israel’s critics. Anyone who tries to lend the report any credibility is surely not a sensible, fair critic of Israel but someone with a sinister agenda. Things could get very revealing.
(Thanks to Tom Gross, who has compiled a typically brilliant dispatch on Goldstone, including an open letter a Dachau survivor has written to Goldstone.)