Archive for the ‘Antisemitism’ Category

jwordI bought a new novel called The J Word when I was at Jewish Book Week. I hadn’t heard of it and I only bought it because it had such a lovely cover. Well, sometimes you can judge a book by its cover because The J Word turned out to be the most fantastic novel I’ve read for many, many a year and I strongly recommend it.

It’s tricky to do full justice to it here without ruining the twists and turns of the plot. However, I can say that it focuses on the relationship between 80-year-old Jack who rejects his Jewishness and his 10-year-old grandson Danny who is curious about his heritage. When Jack is attacked by an antisemitic gang, everything changes and you can find out how by reading it.

My only criticism of The J Word is that it ends. When I got to the end I turned back to page one and read it again. It was just as good second time round. I am planning to run regular Q&A interviews with interesting people here on Oy Va Goy. I’m delighted to say that the first interesting person is author of The J Word, Andrew Sanger.

What were your literary influences when you wrote The J Word? I sensed a dash of Howard Jacobson in there…
I am not a very ‘literary’ person, don’t read all that much and have no particular fondness for modern fiction. I like delicate, skilful use of language, and writers who deal lovingly with ordinary people and ordinary places. Arnold Bennett and John Galsworthy are among my favourite authors, and I have the greatest admiration for Robert Louis Stevenson, especially his travel writing. Absolutely no Howard Jacobson, not even a dash!

Is there such a thing as a ‘Jewish novel’? If so, what is it?
No, there isn’t. Certainly there are novels with Jewish characters, or about Jewish life, or that strike a chord with Jewish readers. But good fiction is always about the human condition.

The characters in The J Word are all fantastic. Naturally, Oy Va Goy was quite a fan of the hardcore duo: Yoav and Ehud. Which character do you personally feel closest to?
Oddly, while writing the book I felt that I myself was all of the characters! That probably doesn’t make any sense and is hard to explain. Of course, the key people in the story are Jack and Danny – the old man rejecting his Jewishness and the young boy keen to embrace it. I identify closely with both of them.

It makes perfect sense and I think many readers will feel the same. The J Word was your debut novel yet top novelists would kill to be able to tell such a serious story with such warmth and optimism. Is a sequel out of the question?
I do think that the best way to get a serious point across is simply to tell a gripping story, and I suppose I rather like the feelgood approach. But despite the ‘warmth and optimism’, I don’t pretend that insoluble problems can be solved or that the world will become a different place. I am deep into another novel now. There are Jewish characters and it too is set in Golders Green, but it is not a sequel to The J-Word.

I understand you have been placed on the Boycott Israel list as an author whose books must be boycotted. I’m furiously jealous. How did you manage that?
As a volunteer in Israel, I was sent to an army base outside Tel Aviv, where I packed emergency kits for IDF field medics and also boxed-up medical aid that Israel sends to other countries. I wrote about the experience for The Independent (of all things!) – after which I received a ton of hate mail and threats of violence and was placed on the Boycott Israel list! Doesn’t seem to have affected sales.

You can buy The J Word, by Andrew Sanger, here.

I remember reading, and being very moved by, the novel The Color Purple as a child. Its author Alice Walker has just toured Gaza and put on an it’s-all-about-me performance of the highest order.

As the report says:

“Walker said her decision to visit Gaza, along with members of the U.S. anti-war group Code Pink, was spurred by the recent death of an older sister. She said she felt a connection to Gazans who lost loved ones in the war.”

Why do these luvvies always try and put themselves centre-stage? I am reminded of my post in January, about Annie Lennox complaining that news reports of Operation Cast Lead ruined her Xmas “as a mother”.

It’s worth reading the report about Walker’s visit in full. Note that she didn’t visit – or even mention – the cities of southern Israel that have been battered by rocket fire. Note too that when given a chance to condemn Hamas, she dodges the question.

What a nasty piece of work she is. Consider me a former fan, Ms Walker.

Geert Wilders has described the British government as “the biggest bunch of cowards in Europe” for not allowing him to enter Britain.

Wilders has called for a ban on the Koran and is considering forming an alliance with antisemitic party in Belgium. So I shed no tears when he was prevented from bringing his preening, divisive circus to town.

However, if Hezbollah spokesman Dr Ibrahim Moussawi is allowed to enter Britain later this month that will be a scandalous hypocrisy. So good luck to Douglas Murray and the Centre For Social Cohesion in their plans on this matter.

Sometimes the blogger is made almost redundant. Such is the sheer stupidity and nastiness of people that there is no commentary to be made, you just have to let them show themselves up.

The fantastic Howard Jacobson has written a breathtakingly brilliant essay in today’s Independent. With a potent combination of passion and clarity, he shows the recent increase in ‘criticism’ of Israel for what it nearly always is: antisemitism. He takes those who liken Gaza to the Warsaw Ghetto and shows once and for all why “there is not the remotest similarity, either in intention or in deed – even in the most grossly mis-reported deed – between Gaza and Warsaw”.

Of those who make such comparisons, he writes: “Given the number of besieged and battered cities there have been in however many thousands of years of pitiless warfare there is only one explanation for this invocation of Warsaw before any of those – it is to wound Jews in their recent and most anguished history and to punish them with their own grief. Its aim is a sort of retrospective retribution, cancelling out all debts of guilt and sorrow. It is as though, by a reversal of the usual laws of cause and effect, Jewish actions of today prove that Jews had it coming to them yesterday.”

Then he takes to pieces Caryl Churchill’s hideous Seven Jewish Children play, in which “lie follows lie, omission follows omission”. He concludes of Churchill’s play: “Once you repeat in another form the medieval blood-libel of Jews rejoicing in the murder of little children, you have crossed over. This is the old stuff. Jew-hating pure and simple.”

Let’s be clear: the Royal Court Theatre has been made fully aware of the dishonesty and racism in the play it is showing. That they keep showing it tells its own story.

Please read Howard’s brilliant essay in full. As regular readers know, I’ve always been a big fan (that’s me below with him last summer). Having read this essay I might have to see if I can find an even bigger pedestal to put him on.

how

So I did indeed meet up with Ashley Perry, the aforementioned ‘settler’ from Israel who is over in England this week. Sorry Peaceniks, but he wasn’t a monster. Not once – as we sat in a boiling hot Solly’s – did he try and steal my chair from me, for instance. Instead he was exactly what I expected him to be: a brilliant and fascinating man.

It was great to hear the inside story of the Israeli elections and Ashley’s predictions for what will happen next. He worked on the Yisrael Beiteinu campaign and whereas I was aware that Avigdor Lieberman has been unfairly demonised, only listening to Ashley did I realise to what extent this is the case. Lieberman could be a good kingmaker for the next Israeli PM. He could certainly do with more people like Ashley on his side.

We talked on. With the extent of anti-Israel feeling in the UK so high, Ashley asked me how much of this I believe is motivated purely by antisemitism. It’s a good question. I don’t want to think that all Israel basher are antisemites. There are surely other feelings that motivate some of them. But are such feelings any less contemptible?

I believe that a substantial number of European opponents of Israel are motivated out of a sense of guilt from the Shoah. Far from taking that sense of guilt and responsibility and using it for something beautiful, they instead use it for the ugliest of things. Against all evidence, they rush – no sprint – to conclude that Israel is committing war crimes, so they can tell themselves ‘They can be monsters, too -  we’re all equal.’

As well as being factually incorrect, this equivalence does the opposite of what its proponents want. It doesn’t wash Europe’s hands of what happened to the Jews in the 20th century. Rather, it reawakens that hatred in the 21st century under a new cloak. So we are back where we started: antisemitism.

Others are motivated out of a ‘bleeding heart’ belief that in aligning themselves with Israel’s enemies, they are backing the underdog against the big bully, the poor brown man against the nasty white man. Never mind that Israel is a tiny state of seven million people surrounded by billions of people who want it wiped off the map. Never mind either that – not that this should matter – numerous Israeli Jews are darker of skin than many of their Arab enemies.

The truth matters not a jot to those who demonise Israel. But why? Why is Israel constantly misrepresented in the media? Why do everyday people who would openly admit to not understanding other conflicts in the world so happily take such a strong stance against Israel despite not knowing even basic facts about the conflict? Why do they consistently overlook egregious human rights abuses and horrific atrocities across the world, while tirelessly – and wrongly – accusing Israel of such crimes?

Always the Jewish state. Is it not the case that all these roads lead to the same thing – antisemitism?

Tzipi Livni’s recollections of her days as a Mossad agent in Paris.

More fascinating samples from Menahem Kahana’s photographic exhibition about the Haredim.

“We don’t take the train after 7 pm, we wear a skullcap only under a hat.” A disturbing account of the rise of antisemitism in France.

A moving letter written by an Israeli who witnessed an IDF swearing-in ceremony at the Kotel.

George Galloway heads off on his muppets’ convoy to Gaza today. How we’ll miss him. I have written before about Galloway’s The Real Deal show on the Iranian-funded television channel Press TV. He sits in a ludicrous set that makes him look like a garden gnome and prattles on about “Zionists” for half an hour or so. It almost always makes for unintentionally hilarious viewing.

The Scottish Saddam-groupie has another show on the station, called Comment. Here, he responds to phone-calls and emails from viewers. Meanwhile, a ticker at the bottom of the screen publishes text messages from viewers. These constitute taking the words ‘genocide’, ‘war crimes’, ‘Israel’ and ‘Satan’ and putting them into random sentences.

But it’s hard to concentrate on these messages because his callers are such a bunch of entertaining loons. Even Galloway gets fed up with some of them. In the most recent episode, he told one: “Go away, because you really are starting to annoy me.” He snapped at another, advising them: “you need medical attention”. Welcome to your fan-base, George.

One caller railed on about how the Twin Towers were hit by remote-control planes. He was supported by a text message asking Galloway why he won’t report “the truth” about the 9/11 attacks. “Too spicy for you?” asked the texter. It got even spicier when another caller asked Galloway why he was working for a pro-Iranian television station, as Iran is obviously working in conjunction with America and Israel. I kid you not.

But then came Ken from London. His voice dripping with disappointment at life, he complained about the Jewish lobby which he says “influences everything from Coronation Street to Eastenders”. He then started whining about the Israel politician “Zippy Lipman” (sic) and said that the images from Gaza during Operation Cast Lead made the Nazi Holocaust “fall into insignificance”.

A few more 9/11 conspiracy folk messaged in and Galloway began to look like he wanted to pack up and go home. Then it was time for another email, which suggested that Iran should arm Hamas and Hezbollah. There’s an idea, huh?

Someone called Majid then rang in and asked Galloway: “Are you practising Islam?” Galloway snapped: “Why would that be any of your business?” and quickly moved on. This was not the only lifestyle question asked of him. “Do you sing because you look like Tom Jones?” asked an emailer. “He’s considerably older than me,” replied Galloway, obviously flattered.

All good things must come to an end. “Well, it’s been marvellous for me and I hope it has been for you,” concluded Galloway at the end of the show. It was certainly revealing. Galloway is an odious man with odious politics. But as he stood there in that bargain-basement studio, listening to his loony fans, he must have wondered where it all went wrong. The trouble is that when you build your career targeting pond life and whipping them into a frenzy of hate, you end up with fans who think that the Rovers Return is the headquarters of a Zionist plot.

As you sow, so you shall reap.

Lots of people have asked me what I think about the Geert Wilders controversy. I will leave the rights and wrongs of him being banned from the House of Lords for another day. Instead, I want to write about the man himself.

Wilders has called for a ban on The Koran. Billions of people have read that holy book for thousands of years and used what they have read only for joyful good. Yes, the free and civilized world is facing a gigantic threat from Islamism, but talk of banning the Koran is both hideous in itself, and does nothing but harm to the cause of those trying to draw attention to threat of Islamism. Wilders’ argument also implicitly excuses those who promote and commit evil in the book’s name: not their fault, your honour, they just read a bad book.

And heck, surely banning books is always wrong? I thought that was what the bad guys did? Wilders’ call for such a ban is breathtakingly hypocritical, coming as it does from a man who is the first to bleat when he feels his own freedom of speech is under threat. He is skilled at such political gymnastics: he claims to be pro-Israel but is considering an alliance with an antisemitic party in Belgium. Classy.

So many brilliant people work so hard and write so eloquently about the dangers of Islamism. These people want to bring light where there is darkness. They want progress. They want peace. I don’t think peace or progress is what Wilders is primarily seeking. Rather, he appears to crave controversy, conflict, increased division and – above all – his martyred position centre-stage.

I shed no tears for this man. I will save my admiration for the likes of brave Muslims like Ed Hussain, Irshad Manji and Ayaan Hirsi Ali. They are the heroes of the hour and put Wilders’ preening agenda in perspective.

In fact, the more I read about this divisive egotist, the more he reminds me of someone else.

gsFirstly, some news about a possible deal to free Gilad Shalit. I will believe it when I see it but here’s hoping and praying. UPDATE: Sure enough, Hamas has denied the Shalit deal story.

A great article from The Australian that exposes the lies about yet another ‘Israeli war crime’ that never was.

Melanie Phillips has posted more disturbing accounts of the ever growing wave of anti-semitism that is sweeping Britain.

There are some marvelous photographs of Israel in the 1930s and 1940s here and here.

Finally, an interesting story about an exhibition of photographs of the Haredim in Israel.

This is a hilarious video in which American comic Denis Leary takes Mel Gibson to task for his anti-semitism. Happy Monday everyone!


Denis Leary-mel Gibson via Noolmusic.com

To all of the UK’s Hamas-apologist bandwagon but particularly it’s odious leaders who whip demonstrators into a hateful frenzy with their dishonest rhetoric…

To the media who wilfully distort what happened in Gaza and why it happened…

To the trade unions and professors who promote anti-Israel hatred at every opportunity…

To Annie Lennox, Alexei Sayle and the rest of the celebrities who marched alongside Hamas supporters…

To the everyday Israel bashers who casually propogate ill-informed, anti-Israel nonsense…

Take a look a look at what happened to this man and then take a look at yourselves.

“I’m afraid the BBC has to stand up to the Israeli authorities occasionally.” So said Health Minister Ben Bradshaw of the BBC Gaza aid controversy. Presuming he’s serious, I think the Health Minister should be examining his own medical health. The BBC does nothing but heap abuse and distortion on Israel.

Similar unhinged thinking from the Catalunya government which has cancelled Holocaust Rememberance Day in protest against Israel’s defensive mission in Gaza. An Israeli friend of mine rang his 88-year-old holocaust survivor grandmother to tell her this news. She described those who made the decision as “little bastards”.Speaking of which, I see the pro-Hamas bandwagon is demonstrating outside the BBC today.

I strong recommend you read the superb article that author, psychiatrist and historian Kenneth Levin has written for FrontPage Magazine about the many enemies of Israel.

He includes the Arab enemies:

There are obviously those eager for Israel’s demise. Since the Jewish state’s creation, the Arab world has wanted it to disappear and this has not changed. Promotion of Arab supremacism, which accords little if any rights to non-Muslim or non-Arab groups in what the Arabs deem their proper domain, extends beyond Israel to abuse of Christians throughout that world as well as of Muslim but non-Arab peoples such as the Kurds of Iraq and Syria, the Muslim blacks of Darfur, the Berbers of Algeria. That abuse has repeatedly reached the level of genocidal campaigns, as reflected not only in the slaughter in Darfur, but also in the murder of some two hundred thousand Kurds in Iraq and some two million Christian and animist blacks in southern Sudan.

In terms of genocidal incitement against minority populations, none is as graphic and incessant as that purveyed in Arab media, mosques and schools – even in countries with which Israel is formally at peace – against the Jews and Israel. The existence of Israel is seen as an intolerable distortion of the proper order of things, according to which Jews should either be dead or, at best, subjugated members of society existing at the sufferance of their Arab betters.

The UN:

Israel is also attacked, and its very existence challenged, in the United Nations, an institution that has largely become the monster it was created to fight….The UNWRA, which for six decades has been responsible for Palestinian refugees and their families, promotes genocide under the flag of the UN. UNWRA schools teach the glories of suicide bombing and martyrdom in the effort to destroy Israel, employ members of terrorist organizations on its staff, including as teachers, and serve as a conduit for recruiting children into terrorist cadres.

The European left and media chatterers:

In addition to the animosity of the Arab world, Israel is faced with much hostile sentiment in Europe, fed by traditional anti-Semitism, by leftist anti-Americanism and association of Israel with America, by perverse, ahistorical leftist twisting of the Israeli-Arab conflict into Israeli colonialists brutalizing the supposedly indigenous population, and by the European media being house organs for anti-Israel bigotry of all these pedigrees. The growing threat of radical Islam to European states, particularly as manifested within those states’ immigrant Muslim populations, has in some quarters led to greater sympathy with Israel’s predicament. But elsewhere, especially among the cadres of the Left, which include most of the media, this threat has had the opposite impact and inspired a wishful thinking that all would be well, Islamist hostility would be appeased, if only Israel would make sufficient amends or simply disappear.

And much more beside. Hats off to the man.

Jon Snow of Channel 4 News presented a Dispatches documentary last night complaining about how Israel managed the media during Operation Cast Lead. Snow was his usual pompous self and was absolutely incredulous that Israel has legitimate concerns about Western reporters producing distorted coverage of the conflict.

Distored coverage? Hmmm, who is this in this video describing the Qassam rockets that Hamas have been firing at Israel as: “pretty pathetic things – nobody gets injured.”

This photograph is of four-year-old Yuval Abebah, just one of the many Israelis who have been killed by the Qassam rockets that Jon Snow thinks are “pretty pathetic things” that injure nobody. Indeed, Abebah was killed long before Snow made this statement.

PS – When Jon Snow reported on last November’s Mumbai massacre, he described the killers as “practitioners”, rather than what they are – Islamic terrorists. (cf the BBC which refuses to describe suicide bombers who blow up school buses full of kids as ‘terrorists’, preferring to use the term ‘militants’, as if they are 21st century Derek Hattons.) Snow also, astonishingly, reported that the Mumbai terrorists showed a “wanton disregard for race or creed” when the exact opposite was the case. They deliberately and carefully targeted Jews, Americans and Britons.

© Copyright Chas Newkey-Burden. All Rights Reserved. Thanks to Chris Morris.