Archive for the ‘The BBC’ Category

Thank goodness this week is almost over. I found the entire Nick Griffin saga almost unbearable. Watching decent people furiously arguing on Facebook, Twitter and in the real world about whether the BBC was right to allow him on Question Time was so upsetting. Because it was all too easy to forget what we had in common: a loathing for the man and his politics.

That said, one of my favourite remarks on the saga came on Facebook. Commenting on Griffin’s nervous tic, my friend Jonathan Sacerdoti observed that “it looked like he was chewing his own face off”. Now that would be required viewing!

The other best statement came on Question Time itself, in the shape of Joel Weiner’s confrontation of Nick Griffin over his Holocaust denial. “How could you,” he asked. It was a straightforward, moving, brave and eloquent intervention. In this interview, Weiner says he was sickened by Griffin’s statement of support for Israel. “I thought [it] was disgusting,” he said. “I don’t want my culture and my people to be associated with him. I’m annoyed with myself because I should have told him that in my comment.”

He shouldn’t be annoyed with himself. He was a beacon of light on a dark evening.

The BBC reports that the cross-party Foreign Affairs Committee insists the government should ‘urgently consider’ talking to Hamas, and says it is ‘regrettable’ that UK-supplied arms were used during Operation Cast Lead.

Ridiculous.  But what of the Hamas rockets that were fired into southern Israel for years? The chairman Michael Gapes said: ‘Rocket fire from Gaza by Hamas and other Palestinian groups on civilian targets in Israel is unacceptable.’

Well that’s a start. But why does Gapes consider it unacceptable?

‘It generates the risk of a renewed escalation in violence, and constitutes a central obstacle in the way of Israeli willingness to move forward towards a two-state settlement.’

Not so much concern then for the dead and terrorised civilians of southern Israel, more a worry about the possible diplomatic knock-on effect of the rockets.

The report ends with a typical ‘BBC moment’. Writing of Hamas, it says: ‘Designated a terrorist organisation by Israel, the US and the EU, it is seen by its supporters as a legitimate fighting force defending Palestinians from a brutal military occupation.’

I’m all for balance but this is nothing of the sort, it’s just lunacy. Were the BBC website around in the 1940s, would it have said: ‘Designated a genocidal organisation by the Jews, the Nazis are seen by their supporters as a legitimate fighting force defending the world from the evil Jews.’

Did you see the excellent Conspiracy Files documentary that BBC2 broadcast this week on the July 7 bombings? I strongly recommend it. It builds into a gripping demolition of every lie that the antisemite-dominated ‘7/7 conspiracy’ movement has told. The hour-long show is currently on BBC iPlayer. If you don’t have time to watch it all, I’d recommend two highlights.

1) Leading conspiracy-freak and Holocaust-denier Nick Kollerstrom being confronted with evidence that undermines the claims he had finger-waggingly delivered earlier in the programme. It’s rabbit-in-the-headlights stuff. (49 mins, 40 seconds).

2) ‘Muab Dib’ – the narrator of a discredited 7/7 conspiracy internet video – being unmasked as John Hill, a white Yorkshireman living in Ireland. The programme-makers confront Hill – who looks like he should be in a ZZ Top tribute band – and find that with his protective cloak of internet anonymity swept away he is not so bold in his beliefs. (52 mins, 40 seconds).

Incidentally, as well as his nonsense about 7/7, Hill has written of his belief that he is the Messiah. Despite Hill and his claims being utterly discredited, the 7/7 conspiracy movement continues to propagate them. Tony Gosling, of the so-called 9/11 Truth Movement, laughingly admits that Hill has been undermined, but continues to promote Hill’s work on radio.

The ‘truth’ movement doesn’t care a jot about the truth. At the end of the programme, Gosling is shown visiting the chairman of Birmingham Central Mosque, to ask if his mosque will promote more of this divisive, discredited nonsense. His visit was successful, that meeting is tomorrow night.

It is easy to dismiss conspiracy theorists as crazies with too much time on their hands. On the evidence of Conspiracy Files, that is undoubtedly true in many cases. But Gosling and some others fill that time by using work they know is discredited, to stir up division and hatred between communities. Horrible, chilling stuff.

In the meantime, my thoughts are with those injured, bereaved or otherwise effected by the bombings, as the anniversary approaches.

During the row about the BBC aid appeal row in January, Ben Bradshaw MP claimed “Israel has a long reputation of bullying the BBC”. He added: “I am afraid the BBC has been cowed by this relentless and persistent pressure from the Israeli Government and they should stand up against it”. Many thought his claims – which he has never substantiated – smacked of antisemitism, particularly as he has a history of bashing Israel.

Presumably Bradshaw would deny the charge of antisemitism and allege it is just a smokescreen. Well, he should know about that technique. After getting caught up in the expenses scandal he has tried to wriggle out of trouble by accusing the newspaper that investigated his financial affairs of homophobia. It would be terrible were that true but this is a smokescreen if ever I saw one – even Peter Tatchell denied the report was homophobic.

Is it wrong to laugh when Israel-bashers get in trouble?

“On all that I have seen, Bowen’s reporting from the Middle East has been informed and scrupulous. The judgement against him is an unwarranted slur on his professionalism and a threat to the notion of objective journalism.”

I kid you not. This is Oliver Kamm on Bowen, whose coverage of Israel is, apparently, informed, scrupulous, professional and objective.

What an extraordinary post!

ged2I’ve been doing the rounds on BBC radio discussing my book Great Email Disasters, off the back of the Damian McBride email scandal.

This morning I did the Breakfast Show on BBC Radio London and the Henry Kelly Show on BBC Radio Berkshire.

You can listen to my BBC Radio London interview here. I think I did well considering I was fast asleep a few minutes before I went on air.

I am due on BBC Three Counties Radio tomorrow morning at 9.40am.

I see the BBC are planning an adaptation of Money by Martin Amis. I’ve always been a big Amis fan, though I prefer his first three novels to his more recent ones. And his memoir Experience is glorious.

I’ve noticed that during interviews – including one about Money - he often describes things as “sort of everything and nothing”. So when I got the chance to interview the great man some years back about his nuclear war fiction, I told friends I reckoned he would say his favourite phrase to me.

On the day, I opened the interview thus:

Me: “So, Martin, how difficult is it to write about nuclear war?”

Him: “It is difficult. Nuclear weapons – they’re sort of everything and nothing, aren’t they?”

Jackpot!

The scene: a BBC TV studio during the 2006 war with Hezbollah.

Indignant BBC interviewer: “How come so many more Lebanese have been killed in this conflict than Israelis?”

Bibi: “Are you sure that you want to start asking in that direction?”

Indignant BBC interviewer: “Why not?”

Bibi: “Because in World War II more Germans were killed than British and Americans combined, but there is no doubt in anyone’s mind that the war was caused by Germany’s aggression.  And in response to the German blitz on London, the British wiped out the entire city of Dresden, burning to death more German civilians than the number of people killed in Hiroshima.

“Moreover, I could remind you that in 1944, when the RAF tried to bomb the Gestapo Headquarters in Copenhagen, some of the bombs missed their target and fell on a Danish children’s hospital, killing 83 little children.

“Perhaps you have another question?”

Perhaps indeed!

bibi

The bias of the BBC against Israel had been very well-documented for some time. Their Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen has long since gave up any pretence of neutrality in his coverage. I actually heard him speak at a literary event a few years ago and I’ll never forget how each time he said the word ‘Palestinian’ his eyes glazed over wistfully, and each time he said ‘Israel’ he spat it out. And who can forget BBC reporter Barbara Platt who cried on air when murdering terrorist Yasser Arafat died?

However, this video of Newsnight reporter Gavin Esler interviewing Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev is astonishing. Esler is absolutely incredulous when Regev points out that Hamas routinely kills its own people. “Oh you’re not serious that Hamas is killing Palestinian children, are you?” asks Esler.

How could Gavin Esler have achieved such a senior post in news broadcasting and yet be so hopelessly naïve of the well-documented tactics of Hamas?

Still, thank goodness for Mark Regev, who has been a wonderful ambassador during this conflict. Benjamin Netanyahu, too, has been a star. My favourite ‘Bibi’ moment came when he was interviewed on the BBC during the 2006 Hezbollah conflict and made mince meat of his quizzer:

Interviewer: “How come so many more Lebanese have been killed in this conflict than Israelis?”

Netanyahu: “Are you sure that you want to start asking in that direction?”

Interviewer: “Why not?”

Netanyahu: “Because in World War II more Germans were killed than British and Americans combined, but there is no doubt in anyone’s mind that the war was caused by Germany’s aggression. And in response to the German blitz on London, the British wiped out the entire city of Dresden, burning to death more German civilians than the number of people killed in Hiroshima.

“Moreover, I could remind you that in 1944, when the RAF tried to bomb the Gestapo Headquarters in Copenhagen, some of the bombs missed their target and fell on a Danish children’s hospital, killing 83 little children.

“Perhaps you have another question?”

Perhaps indeed! And perhaps Gavin Esler should find some time for some rudimentary research before spouting off at Mark Regev.

© Copyright Chas Newkey-Burden. All Rights Reserved. Thanks to Chris Morris.